HER2Know
HER2Know Logo
  • Tumor Types
    • Welcome to the new, updated HER2Know

      We have expanded our resource library so you can now explore content on HER2 in tumors beyond breast.

      Looking for the original HER2Know breast cancer resources?

      • Breast Cancer
        • Breast Cancer Overview
        • Breast Cancer Resources
        • IHC Atlas
        • Pathologists' Perspectives
          • Clinical Case Reviews
          • Spotlight Series
        • Knowledge Check
      • Gastric Cancer
        • Gastric Cancer Overview
        • Gastric Cancer Resources
      • Other Solid Tumors
        • Other Solid Tumors Resources
       
  • Resources
  • Contributors
  • Subscribe
  • TUMOR TYPES
  • Breast Cancer
    • Breast Cancer Overview
    • Breast Cancer Resources
    • IHC Atlas
    • Pathologists' perspectives
    • Clinical Case Reviews
    • Spotlight Series
    • Knowledge Check
  • Gastric Cancer
    • Gastric Cancer Overview
    • Gastric Cancer Resources
  • Other Solid Tumors
    • Other Solid Tumors Resources
  • Resources
  • Contributors
  • Subscribe
  • ...
  • Pathologists' Perspectives
  • Spotlight Series
  • Impact of pre-analytic variables on HER2 IHC results
  • Back to Spotlight Series

Impact of pre-analytic variables on HER2 IHC results

Dr. Khoury, MD, reviews several different pre-analytic variables and their impact on HER2 IHC assessment.

 
  •  LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
The importance of reporting discrete HER2 IHC scores

Thaer Khoury

MD

Thaer Khoury, MD, has been the Chief of Breast Pathology service at Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo NY since 2019, and Vice Chair of Anatomic Pathology since 2021. In this article, Dr. Khoury, MD, reviews several different pre-analytic variables and their impact on HER2 IHC testing. Particularly focusing on cold ischemia, he discusses the negative impact that extended cold ischemic time can have on specimens and highlights the importance of following the ASCO-CAP guidelines to ensure standardized procedures.

What are pre-analytic variables in HER2 testing, and why is it important to standardize them?

Consistent and accurate breast biomarker testing is important, as the results are an integral part of the decision to treat patients with HER2 directed therapies over endocrine therapies decision making.1-3 Therefore, consistency in pathology practices, from specimen collection, handling, and processing is critical for reliable testing and treatment decision making.3 Pre-analytic variables including ischemic time (warm and cold), time in formalin (under-fixation, and over-fixation), type of fixative, antibody clone, and conditions/storage time of slides can all affect biomarker testing results.3 Warm ischemic time is defined as the length of time during surgery in which the blood supply is cut off while the temperature around the tumor remains the same.3 Cold ischemic time is the time between tissue removal and the initiation of formalin permeation of the tissue which should ideally be less than 1 hour.3,4 Furthermore, if the tumor is not directly exposed to formalin, the formalin takes time to penetrate to the tumor through the normal breast tissue; therefore, the cold ischemic time could be underestimated.3 Fixation time is the total amount of time a specimen is in a fixative solution such as formalin. The standard type of fixative is 10% neutral buffered formalin. Tissue is considered under-fixed if the fixation time is <6 hours, and over-fixed if the time is >72 hours.4 Additional factors that could impact HER2 IHC test results include the storage/shipping conditions if slides are being sent out for testing, and the time before starting staining as well as total time of tissue storage before testing.3,5

Why is standardization of pre-analytic variables important for identifying tumors with HER2-low expression?

Most studies have evaluated the effect of the pre-analytic variables on the HER2 IHC testing based on classification of HER2 into negative, equivocal, and positive status.

“Since HER2-low (IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH-) has gained clinical significance, it is expected that effects of the pre-analytic variables on HER2-low status will be the focus of future studies.”

Current evidence suggests that pre-analytic variables may negatively impact HER2-low interpretation.3,6

How has the standardization of pre-analytic variables evolved over time in testing guidelines? And in pathology practice?

The ASCO-CAP guidelines for HER2 testing have evolved throughout the years. There has been increased emphasis placed on pre-analytic variables, as numerous studies have proven their importance.4,7,8 The 2023 ASCO-CAP guidelines recommend cold ischemic time be as short as possible, and time in formalin between 6 and 72 hours.8 In my own institution, for core needle biopsies the processor is set up to a start time that ensures at least 6 hours in formalin, to comply with ASCO-CAP guideline recommendations. For resection specimens, the tissue is immediately serially sectioned upon receipt and immersed in formalin. If cutting the sample is not possible in the proper manner (serially sectioning and mapping), a pilot section from the tumor is taken. When a sample comes late on a Friday before a long weekend, the pilot section is processed to ensure time in formalin does not exceed 72 hours.

What are the consequences of a prolonged cold ischemic time? How can this be identified on a slide?

When the tumor is not exposed to formalin, such as during cold ischemic time, the cells undergo ischemic injury which leads to cell death or necrosis.1 This would trigger a cascade of events that degrades the protein and DNA (Figure 1-4).

“Studies have shown HER2 protein degradation demonstrated by one- or two-step HER2 IHC score reduction (i.e. from IHC 2+ to 1+, and from IHC 2+ to 0).”3,6

As for the DNA, two ISH methods have been tested, including FISH and D-ISH; these studies have demonstrated poor HER2 hybridization when FISH is used, and many artifacts when D-ISH was used.2,9 The key to recognizing poor fixation is the change in the histomorphology of the tumor – where the periphery seems properly fixed and the center shows necrosis, in which the cells become edematous with cytoplasmic vacuoles, and the nuclei show pyknosis, karyorrhexis, or karyolysis (depending on the degree of autolysis) (Figure 1 and Figure 2).3,10 IHC staining would also show variation between these zones (Figure 3 and Figure 4).

Figure 1. Part of the tumor showing the effect of prolonged cold ischemic time (H&E, 20X).

Figure 2. Part of the tumor showing a well-preserved area (H&E, 20X).

Figure 3. HER2 IHC stain in the area exposed to cold ischemia with negative staining (IHC 0) (a. 20X; b. 40X).

Figure 4. HER2 IHC stain in the well-preserved area of a tumor with positive staining (IHC 2+) (a. 20X; b. 40X).

What are your key takeaways for optimizing pre-analytic variables for HER2 testing in your clinical practice?

There are a number of key considerations when optimizing pre-analytic variables for HER2 IHC testing in my clinical practice:

  • Closely follow the recommendations outlined in the 2023 ASCO-CAP guideline update for HER2 testing8
  • Keep up to date with relevant scientific literature as well as clinical practice updates
  • Be cognizant of the histomorphological signs which suggest pre-analytic factors may have altered IHC staining
  • Develop standard operating procedures within institutions on how to handle samples to avoid negative impacts of pre-analytic variables, such as under- and over-fixation
  • If a sample has preanalytical issues, and another sample from the same patient is available and meets acceptability criteria for HER2 IHC, it should be tested
  • When a sample does not meet the specimen quality criteria, it can still be useful to report the results, however there must be documentation or a disclaimer stating the pre-analytical issues encountered and that results should be interpreted with caution

ASCO, American Society of Clinical Oncology; CAP, College of American Pathologists; D-ISH, dual-probe in situ hybridization; DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; H&E, hematoxylin, and eosin stain; IHC, immunohistochemistry; ISH, in situ hybridization.

1. Goldstein NS, et al. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003; 120:86-92. 2. Khoury T, et al. Mod Pathol. 2009; 22:1457-1467. 3. Khoury T, et al. Am J Clin Pathol. 2018; 149(4):275-292. 4. Wolff, AC, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31:3997-4013. 5. Omilian AR, et al. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2020; 28(4):267-273. 6. Yildiz-Aktas IZ, et al. Mod Pathol. 2012; 25:1098-1105. 7. Wolff AC, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2007; 25(1):118-145. 8. Wolff AC, et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023;147(9):993-1000. 9. Troxell M, et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2020; 144(12):1525-1534. 10. Rastogi V, et al. J Cin Diagn Res. 2013; 7(10):2408.

Did you find this content useful?
Help us get it right next time by liking this article

.

Explore more Spotlight Series

View all

The Pathology Faculty share their thoughts on dealing with complexities associated with HER2 IHC assessment.

Unusual staining pattern: Basolateral staining in micropapillary carcinoma

In this article, Dr. Jaffer, MD, details the interpretation of biomarker testing in invasive micropapillary carcinomas.

by Shabnam Jaffer, MD

 
  •  LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook

Decalcified bone specimen: Processing procedures

In this article, Dr. Wei, MD, PhD, discusses the use of bone specimens as samples for HER2 IHC in metastatic breast cancer.

by Shi Wei, MD, PhD

 
  •  LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook

Recommendations for testing of cytology specimens

In this article, Dr. Bui, MD, PhD, discusses the advantages and disadvantages of using cytology samples for HER2 IHC testing in breast cancer.

by Marylin Bui, MD, PhD

 
  •  LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
Her2know Logo

Quick Links

  • Subscribe
  • Resources
  • Contributors

 

Breast Cancer Links

  • Breast Cancer Overview
  • Breast Cancer Resources
  • IHC Atlas
  • Clinical Case Reviews
  • Spotlight Series
  • Knowledge Check

 

Gastric Cancer Links

  • Gastric Cancer Overview
  • Gastric Cancer Resources

About Us

  • Contact Us
  • Request Medical Follow-Up
  • AstraZeneca
  • AZ Medical
  • Daiichi Sankyo Company
  • DSI Medical
  • Your Privacy Choices

Legal

  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookie Preferences
  • Legal Notices & Terms of Use
  • Consumer Health Data Privacy Notice
.
Daiichi-Sankyo - AstraZeneca Footer

©2025 Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca
PP-US-8201a-2248, PP-US-8201a-1849, PP-US-8201a-2036, US-84238, US-93987, US-102659 11/25

HER2Know Logo

Request an AstraZeneca Medical Affairs Representative Follow-Up

Welcome to HER2Know

This website is intended to help healthcare professionals practicing in the United States find and access scientifically balanced, evidence-based, and peer-led information and professional resources in support of HER2 IHC evaluation. The dissemination of this information may be subject to different medical and regulatory requirements in other countries. This information is provided for educational purposes only. It is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual patients. Are you a healthcare professional practicing in the United States?

I am a Daiichi Sankyo Company or AstraZeneca authorized person

What is a Daiichi Sankyo Company or AstraZeneca authorized person?

This website is only intended for healthcare professionals practicing in the United States and authorized Daiichi Sankyo Company or AstraZeneca personnel. US Headquarters personnel and US Field Medical personnel are authorized to browse and search the database for their own background knowledge and insight. This website is not intended for use by US Field Sales personnel. None of the content of this site should be directly linked or distributed without approval.

Self Certification Buttons
No, take me to AstraZeneca.com Self Certification Buttons