HER2Know
HER2Know Logo
  • Tumor Types
    • Welcome to the new, updated HER2Know

      We have expanded our resource library so you can now explore content on HER2 in tumors beyond breast.

      Looking for the original HER2Know breast cancer resources?

      • Breast Cancer
        • Breast Cancer Overview
        • Breast Cancer Resources
        • IHC Atlas
        • Pathologists' Perspectives
          • Clinical Case Reviews
          • Spotlight Series
        • Knowledge Check
      • Gastric Cancer
        • Gastric Cancer Overview
        • Gastric Cancer Resources
      • Other Solid Tumors
        • Other Solid Tumors Resources
       
  • Resources
  • Contributors
  • Subscribe
  • TUMOR TYPES
  • Breast Cancer
    • Breast Cancer Overview
    • Breast Cancer Resources
    • IHC Atlas
    • Pathologists' perspectives
    • Clinical Case Reviews
    • Spotlight Series
    • Knowledge Check
  • Gastric Cancer
    • Gastric Cancer Overview
    • Gastric Cancer Resources
  • Other Solid Tumors
    • Other Solid Tumors Resources
  • Resources
  • Contributors
  • Subscribe
  • ...
  • Pathologists' Perspectives
  • Clinical Case Reviews
  • Interpreting HER2 IHC with an extensive in situ component
  • Back to Clinical Case Reviews

Interpreting HER2 IHC with an extensive in situ component

Case contributed by Hannah Wen, MD, PhD

 
  •  LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
The importance of reporting discrete HER2 IHC scores

Hannah Wen

MD, PhD

Case details

  • Age

    68
  • Gender

    Female

  • Tumor grade

    2
  • Primary/metastatic breast cancer

    Primary
  • Type of breast cancer

    Invasive lobular carcinoma
  • Hormone receptor status

    ER: Positive (90%, strong intensity)
    PR: Positive (90%, strong intensity)
  • HER2 by IHC

    0
  • Specimen type in primary setting:

    Mastectomy

This case is a mastectomy specimen of primary invasive lobular carcinoma, grade 2. There was an extensive in situ component present along with the invasive carcinoma, and HER2 IHC scores were discordant between the two. In situ components may be ductal or lobular in nature. Regardless, it is important to only evaluate the invasive component of the specimen and ignore all in situ components when determining a patient’s HER2 IHC score.1-3

Case summary

A total mastectomy was performed on a 68-year-old female with primary invasive lobular carcinoma.
The cold ischemic time for the specimen was under 1 hour and fixation was in 10% NBF for 24 hours. Biomarkers were performed on the sample, and controls were all appropriate.

Figure 1. H&E and HER2 IHC staining (IHC 0, 20X).

View whole slide image

What does the HER2 IHC staining indicate?

On the whole slide image (Figure 1), the area of invasive carcinoma shows no staining of HER2 (IHC 0). However, there is an extensive carcinoma in situ that shows complete and intense circumferential membrane staining. This can lead to misinterpretation of the specimen as HER2-positive, if not recognized as an in situ component.

The 2023 ASCO-CAP guideline update states that only the invasive component of a tumor should be evaluated for HER2 expression.1 In situ components should never be included in this evaluation.2 To aid in differentiating invasive and in situ components it is helpful to always review the H&E and IHC slides in conjunction.3

A visual guide with examples of whole slide images corresponding to each HER2 IHC score may help with HER2 assessment. HER2 differentiation in practice: a quick visual guide can be found in the Supporting Resources.

Discussion

This case is challenging as there is discordance between HER2 IHC scores of the invasive carcinoma and the in situ component, with the in situ component potentially giving the appearance of a positive HER2 IHC result (false positive result). In situ components can be ductal or lobular in nature, DCIS or LCIS, respectively.4 It is important to be cognizant of the in situ components in invasive breast cancer IHC evaluation, as this component may be extensive in nature, and intermingled with the invasive component.2,3

It is important to always review the corresponding H&E slide together with the IHC slide and determine the invasive components of the specimen that should then be evaluated.3 In situ components can be apparent on H&E sections, however, in difficult cases IHC for myoepithelial markers can be used to distinguish the invasive and in situ components.5

Considerations:

  • Discordance between the HER2 IHC score of the invasive carcinoma and in situ component can make case interpretation challenging*

  • HER2 staining of the in situ component should not be included in the HER2 IHC interpretation2,3

  • Always review the corresponding H&E slide with the IHC3


Scroll through more Clinical Case Reviews for guidance on approaching challenging clinical cases.

*These practice considerations represent the opinions of the Breast Pathology Faculty. Members of the Breast Pathology Faculty have been contracted as paid advisors through Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca and have received compensation for their time.

ASCO, American Society of Clinical Oncology; CAP, College of American Pathologists; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ; ER, estrogen receptor; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin stain; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; IHC, immunohistochemistry; LCIS, lobular carcinoma in situ; NBF, neutral buffered formalin; PR, progesterone receptor.​

1. Wolff AC, et al. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023;147(9):993-1000. 2. Hicks DG and Schiffhauer L. Laboratory Medicine 2011;42(8):459-467. 3. Wolff AC, et al. J Clin Oncol 2007;25(1):118-145. 4. Makki J. Clinical Medicine Insights: Pathology 2015;8:23-31. 5. Zaha DC. World J Clin Oncol 2014;5(3):382-392.

Did you find this content useful?
Help us get it right next time by liking this article

.

Explore more Clinical Case Reviews

View all

In this series of articles, the Pathology Faculty share their experience with complex clinical cases and highlight practices that help to aid consistency in HER2 IHC scoring.

Assessing HER2 IHC with cytoplasmic staining

In this case, the HER2 IHC on a segmental mastectomy specimen from a primary invasive ductal carcinoma showed an unusual cytoplasmic staining pattern.

by Savitri Krishnamurthy, MD

 
  •  LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook

Assessing HER2 IHC with edge artifacts

In this case, the HER2 IHC of a core needle biopsy specimen from an invasive breast carcinoma showed signs of edge artifact.

by Gary Tozbikian, MD

 
  •  LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook

The importance of reporting discrete HER2 IHC scores

In this case, the patient presented with primary breast cancer classified as HER2-negative.

by Marilyn Bui, MD, PhD

 
  •  LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
Her2know Logo

Quick Links

  • Subscribe
  • Resources
  • Contributors

 

Breast Cancer Links

  • Breast Cancer Overview
  • Breast Cancer Resources
  • IHC Atlas
  • Clinical Case Reviews
  • Spotlight Series
  • Knowledge Check

 

Gastric Cancer Links

  • Gastric Cancer Overview
  • Gastric Cancer Resources

About Us

  • Contact Us
  • Request Medical Follow-Up
  • AstraZeneca
  • AZ Medical
  • Daiichi Sankyo Company
  • DSI Medical
  • Your Privacy Choices

Legal

  • Privacy Notice
  • Cookie Preferences
  • Legal Notices & Terms of Use
  • Consumer Health Data Privacy Notice
.
Daiichi-Sankyo - AstraZeneca Footer

©2025 Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and AstraZeneca
PP-US-8201a-2248, PP-US-8201a-1849, PP-US-8201a-2036, US-84238, US-93987, US-102659 11/25

HER2Know Logo

Request an AstraZeneca Medical Affairs Representative Follow-Up

Welcome to HER2Know

This website is intended to help healthcare professionals practicing in the United States find and access scientifically balanced, evidence-based, and peer-led information and professional resources in support of HER2 IHC evaluation. The dissemination of this information may be subject to different medical and regulatory requirements in other countries. This information is provided for educational purposes only. It is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual patients. Are you a healthcare professional practicing in the United States?

I am a Daiichi Sankyo Company or AstraZeneca authorized person

What is a Daiichi Sankyo Company or AstraZeneca authorized person?

This website is only intended for healthcare professionals practicing in the United States and authorized Daiichi Sankyo Company or AstraZeneca personnel. US Headquarters personnel and US Field Medical personnel are authorized to browse and search the database for their own background knowledge and insight. This website is not intended for use by US Field Sales personnel. None of the content of this site should be directly linked or distributed without approval.

Self Certification Buttons
No, take me to AstraZeneca.com Self Certification Buttons